| Impact of Proposed Policy Change on the Number of FDIC-Regulated Institutions Required to Comply with the Community Reinvestment Act | |||||||
| State | 250 Mil - 500 Mil | 500 Mil - 1 Bil | GT 1 Bil | # of Institutions Currently Required to Participate (Assets Equal to or Greater Than 250 Million) | # of Institutions Required to Participate under Proposed Policy Change (Assets Greater Than $1 Billion) | Reduction in # of Institutions Required to Participate | Percent Reduction in Participating Institutions |
| AK | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 100% |
| AL | 17 | 9 | 9 | 20 | 1 | 19 | 95% |
| AR | 26 | 6 | 4 | 15 | 2 | 13 | 87% |
| AZ | 4 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 100% |
| CA | 54 | 34 | 63 | 64 | 23 | 41 | 64% |
| CO | 32 | 6 | 7 | 25 | 3 | 22 | 88% |
| CT | 12 | 11 | 8 | 24 | 6 | 18 | 75% |
| DE | 8 | 1 | 17 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 54% |
| FL | 39 | 23 | 21 | 34 | 3 | 31 | 91% |
| GA | 53 | 11 | 11 | 56 | 6 | 50 | 89% |
| HI | 2 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 25% | |
| IA | 20 | 12 | 4 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 83% |
| ID | 7 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 100% | |
| IL | 93 | 41 | 34 | 85 | 13 | 72 | 85% |
| IN | 28 | 16 | 15 | 22 | 3 | 19 | 86% |
| KS | 19 | 11 | 7 | 14 | 1 | 13 | 93% |
| KY | 18 | 7 | 5 | 21 | 3 | 18 | 86% |
| LA | 22 | 4 | 4 | 21 | 1 | 20 | 95% |
| MA | 59 | 26 | 24 | 98 | 17 | 81 | 83% |
| MD | 26 | 8 | 9 | 21 | 6 | 15 | 71% |
| ME | 13 | 9 | 2 | 15 | 1 | 14 | 93% |
| MI | 28 | 8 | 13 | 29 | 7 | 22 | 76% |
| MN | 25 | 7 | 4 | 17 | 0 | 17 | 100% |
| MO | 40 | 12 | 11 | 40 | 4 | 36 | 90% |
| MS | 14 | 4 | 7 | 20 | 5 | 15 | 75% |
| MT | 8 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 100% |
| NC | 15 | 17 | 8 | 29 | 4 | 25 | 86% |
| ND | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 75% |
| NE | 12 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 80% |
| NH | 9 | 3 | 3 | 11 | 1 | 10 | 91% |
| NJ | 30 | 16 | 29 | 40 | 11 | 29 | 73% |
| NM | 8 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 100% |
| NV | 5 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 33% |
| NY | 43 | 25 | 46 | 49 | 22 | 27 | 55% |
| OH | 38 | 18 | 26 | 18 | 2 | 16 | 89% |
| OK | 15 | 6 | 7 | 10 | 2 | 8 | 80% |
| OR | 6 | 4 | 4 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 82% |
| PA | 62 | 37 | 34 | 57 | 15 | 42 | 74% |
| RI | 1 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 40% |
| SC | 11 | 4 | 7 | 13 | 3 | 10 | 77% |
| SD | 8 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 80% |
| TN | 33 | 10 | 7 | 25 | 2 | 23 | 92% |
| TX | 47 | 32 | 30 | 42 | 8 | 34 | 81% |
| UT | 9 | 7 | 9 | 19 | 8 | 11 | 58% |
| VA | 41 | 16 | 12 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 63% |
| VT | 5 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 60% |
| WA | 13 | 18 | 11 | 32 | 7 | 25 | 78% |
| WI | 36 | 11 | 12 | 28 | 1 | 27 | 96% |
| WV | 9 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 100% | |
| WY | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | |
| TOTAL | 1,110 | 219 | 891 | 80% | |||
| Table based on data supplied by the Senate Banking Committee | |||||||